来书云：「先生又曰：『照心非动也。』岂以其循理而谓之静欤？『妄心亦照也。』岂以其良知未尝不在于其中，未尝不明于其中，而视听言动之不过则者，皆天理欤？且既曰妄心，则在妄心可谓之照，而在照心则谓之妄矣。妄与息何异？今假妄之照以续至诚之无息，窃所未明，幸再启蒙。」
「照心非动」者，以其发于本体明觉之自然，而未尝有所动也；有所动即妄矣。「妄心亦照」者，以其本体明觉之自然者，未尝不在于其中，但有所动耳；无所动即照矣。无妄、无照，非以妄为照、以照为妄也。照心为照，妄心为妄，是犹有妄、有照也。有妄、有照，则犹贰也，贰则息矣。无妄、无照则不贰，不贰则不息矣。
来信说：「先生又说：『照心非动也』，岂是因为它循理而称之为静？『妄心亦照也』，岂是因为良知未尝不在其中、未尝不明于其中，而视听言动的合乎准则者都是天理？但既然叫妄心，那么在妄心可称之为照，而在照心就该称之为妄了。妄与息有什么不同？如今借妄心之照来接续至诚的无息，我不明白，请再启蒙。」
「照心非动」，是因为它发自本体明觉的自然，未尝有所动；有所动便是妄了。「妄心亦照」，是因为本体的自然明觉未尝不在其中，只是有所动罢了；无所动便是照了。无妄无照，并不是以妄为照、以照为妄。照心为照、妄心为妄，就还有妄、有照；有妄有照，就还是贰；贰就息了。无妄无照则不贰，不贰就不息。
Your letter says: 'You say the mirroring mind does not move — is it called still because it follows principle? And the deluded mind also mirrors — is it because innate knowledge is never absent or unlit within it, so that seeing, hearing, speech and action within the norm are all heavenly principle? But if it is called deluded, then in the deluded mind it may be called mirroring, and in the mirroring mind, deluded. How does delusion differ from cessation? Borrowing the deluded mind's mirroring to continue utmost sincerity's unceasing — I do not understand; instruct me again.'
The mirroring mind does not move: it issues from the natural bright awareness of the substance, never moved; once moved, it is delusion. The deluded mind also mirrors: the substance's natural bright awareness is never absent within it, only there is movement; without movement it is mirroring. No-delusion, no-mirroring does not mean taking delusion as mirroring or mirroring as delusion. Mirroring as mirroring and delusion as delusion still leaves delusion and mirroring present; present, there is doubleness; doubled, it ceases. No-delusion, no-mirroring is undoubled; undoubled, unceasing.